Context in
Give it the brief. Change the brief. It keeps both.
Text, images, sketches, existing CAD. Add them up front or alter them once the work has started.
Hylos Labs
Frontier models can reason about the physical world. Hylos builds the infrastructure they need to act in it: a persistent 3D scene with addressable objects, shared controls, and verification before changes commit.
The scene carries context across turns, tools, and models.
The gap
World models can produce a convincing room. Frontier models can call Fusion, Omniverse, and Isaac. What comes back can look finished and still be physically false: objects that interpenetrate, contact that never happens, a collision shape standing in for the part. Success on that output does not mean the thing can be made. It does not mean the real arrangement was tested.
Check whether it still fits before the change is committed. That is the scene the next action inherits.
The file
Part in the file
Fit not checked
Part larger
Lid and mounts unchanged
Doesn’t close
The runtime
Hylos turns intent and evidence into a persistent, typed 3D scene: objects the agent can address, relationships it can act on, and constraints that remain in force.
People and agents share its controls. Connected tools supply the measurements. The runtime holds the state each next action inherits.
Of all the spaces an agent could operate in, a product assembly is the one where being wrong is cheapest to detect and most expensive to ship. A CAD kernel can measure whether the scene is true. That made product engineering the right place to prove the runtime, and the first thing worth selling on it. The result is Impulse.
You give Impulse the brief. It plans the parts, builds them in real CAD, measures whether they fit, move, and can be manufactured, and hands back only what passed. Engineering work you can hand off, because it comes back checked.
Context in
Text, images, sketches, existing CAD. Add them up front or alter them once the work has started.
Its engineering, your decision
Fits, clearances, and construction stay in the loop. A real design choice comes back to you, with the plan attached.
The build, in the open
Part by part, the reasoning stays on screen. What lands is a verified build, every part credited.
Stay in the loop
Does the lid open under its own weight? Impulse answers against the live product, and a change re-enters the same loop.
Use Cases
A product assembly, a training environment, a workcell, or a building: each needs addressable objects, allowed actions, persistent constraints, and a way to verify what changed.
Impulse · current product
“Fit a larger battery into this enclosure.”
Keep mounting interfaces, clearance limits, and lid motion as scene requirements. Propagate the battery change through affected dependencies and check the revised assembly.
More of the engineering work can be delegated.
Robot learning · roadmap
“Run this task in 200 different kitchens.”
Define interactive objects, joint limits, and success conditions. Vary layouts and assets while preserving the task requirements used to evaluate each run.
Less custom setup for each environment.
Workcells · roadmap
“Replace this robot with a smaller one.”
Recompute reach, clearances, and dependent placements for the new robot. Carry constraints and the reasons for layout choices into each revision.
Faster answers before a physical reconfiguration.
Facilities & twins · roadmap
“Can we get this machine into the building?”
Turn site evidence into an operable scene of openings, routes, equipment, and access requirements. Revise the installation plan when the observed site changes.
Discover infeasible plans before installation day.
Illustrative use cases. Impulse is live; the environment SDK, simulation adapters, and workcell and twin applications are proposed. Building in one of these areas? →
Research and posture
A model is allowed to be brilliant and wrong. It proposes; it never grades its own work. Every check runs on instruments the model cannot influence, and a change only becomes real after they pass. Better models will fail fewer checks. They will not get to skip them.
Inside Hylos · Research films & essays
Three short films on the spatial runtime behind Impulse—each paired with interactive diagrams and the exact calculation a reviewer can check.
Film 01 · Control theory
A rejected edit brings the design back to its starting point. The agent has spent a retry. Are those the same state?
Film 02 · Mereotopology
The fit report says 7 mm. The rims are flush. Where did the caliper jaws land?
Film 03 · Inverse design
You can aim it warm or cold. Why won’t one setting work for both?
Papers & filings
The public technical whitepaper. Why MCP tool wires and triangle-mesh generators fail physical boundaries, the (S, C, V) spatial OS, the 5 OCCT credit doors, 6-domain continuum adjoint PDEs, the 3-source robotics task-state gate, and the whole-assembly RLVR flywheel.
The public manuscript. Claims early and in public; mechanisms behind filings.
A provisional patent covering the core verification and repair machinery was filed July 2026. A second, covering subsequently developed mechanisms, is in preparation.
In preparation
Company
Hylos Labs is a Canadian company. Impulse is the first product. We are talking with investors, design partners, and teams working at the edge of autonomy, simulation, and spatial AI.
Chris Da Silva
Founder · CTO
Founder of Hylos Labs and creator of Impulse. Built the spatial reasoning, CAD authoring, and verification architecture. Repeat technical founder, focused on making engineering work reliable enough to delegate rather than assist.
Randy Yang
Co-founder · Head of Product
Eighteen years bringing physical products from concept through commercialization. Runs ORYN Studio. Has launched award-winning products across mobility, child safety, healthcare, and consumer. Owns how Impulse fits a real product-development workflow.